CARDIFFWALESMAP

f o r u m

if it's about Cardiff..
Sport, Entertainment, Transportation, Business,
Development Projects, Leisure, Eating, Drinking,
Nightlife, Shopping, Train Spotting! etc..
then we want it here!


City Centre
:: You Tube :: FLICKR :: Cardiff Bay :: CCFC Stadium :: Cardiff Sports Village :: Wales Map :: brought to you by... PR Design and Print

 

 

CardiffWalesMap
Start a New Topic 
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Author
Comment
Re: never trust a politician

Jantra
Perhaps if you understood what commercial meant then we could avoid this car crash of a discussion. commercial means to trade. nothing more, nothing less.


YOU started this thread. YOU asked me if Plaid had any policies to improve Wales' economy. YOU have gone off at several tangents and turned your thread into a 'car-crash'!
Do you have any self-awareness?

Re: never trust a politician

B. Lee Dingobvious
Jantra
Perhaps if you understood what commercial meant then we could avoid this car crash of a discussion. commercial means to trade. nothing more, nothing less.


YOU started this thread. YOU asked me if Plaid had any policies to improve Wales' economy. YOU have gone off at several tangents and turned your thread into a 'car-crash'!
Do you have any self-awareness?


when this discussion was started you never mentioned plaid policy for a people's bank. You mention it months later. that is moot. i'm not necessarily against it. It would be useful if you understood that.

What I said was it had to be run on commercial lines like all banks. Simon got his knickers in a twist when I said all banks need to be run on commercial lines - all because BoE has the word bank in it. So does a blood bank but we're not suggesting they lend money either are we. That was the discussion I was referring to.

Do you disagree the bank should be run commercially? if not how do you propose the bank lends money to Welsh business?



Re: never trust a politician

Jantra


Perhaps if you understood what commercial meant then we could avoid this car crash of a discussion. commercial means to trade. nothing more, nothing less.


Good grief Jantra! By talking about operating commercial principles, it's very clear what you meant. You meant operating with a profit motive, so don't start backtracking. I half expect you to claim you meant a TV advert by saying "commercial" next.

Re: never trust a politician

simon__200
Jantra


Perhaps if you understood what commercial meant then we could avoid this car crash of a discussion. commercial means to trade. nothing more, nothing less.


Good grief Jantra! By talking about operating commercial principles, it's very clear what you meant. You meant operating with a profit motive, so don't start backtracking. I half expect you to claim you meant a TV advert by saying "commercial" next.


you may think commercial means 'with profit motive'. I can assure you I don't. If I had wanted to refer to profit then I would have said profit.

Re: never trust a politician

Jantra
simon__200
Jantra


Perhaps if you understood what commercial meant then we could avoid this car crash of a discussion. commercial means to trade. nothing more, nothing less.


Good grief Jantra! By talking about operating commercial principles, it's very clear what you meant. You meant operating with a profit motive, so don't start backtracking. I half expect you to claim you meant a TV advert by saying "commercial" next.


you may think commercial means 'with profit motive'. I can assure you I don't. If I had wanted to refer to profit then I would have said profit.


What you said was "that it is not possible for a bank to exist without it operating on a commercial basis", so if you're saying you meant specifically "Commercial Banking", rather than commercialism per se, then you'd effectively be saying "the only type of banking in existence is Commercial Banking". Which is tantamount to saying Retail Banking and Investment Banking doesn't exist. Which is ludicrous.

That coupled with the entire premise that the bank we've actually been discussing would be for the purpose of making loans to businesses (i.e. Commercial Banking), the phrase "The bank needs to be run on commercial lines otherwise it will fail. would indicate that those "commercial lines" you're talking about were pertaining to commercialism in the broader sense, because it's tautological otherwise. "The Commercial Bank needs to be run as a Commercial Bank".

It sure seems like you're just playing games sometimes, Jantra!

Re: never trust a politician

simon__200

What you said was "that it is not possible for a bank to exist without it operating on a commercial basis", so if you're saying you meant specifically "Commercial Banking", rather than commercialism per se, then you'd effectively be saying "the only type of banking in existence is Commercial Banking". Which is tantamount to saying Retail Banking and Investment Banking doesn't exist. Which is ludicrous.

are you sure you know what you are talking about? who has said anything about commercial banking? you're now making things up to suit. What I said was that banks need to operate on a commercial basis. That means they need to provide products and services that their customers wish to use at a price that is competitive. It is not good having the Welsh nation's best interests at heart but not actually be able to provide a service that people or businesses will use. There are many banks out there and if the People Bank of Wales don't provide competitively priced services then it will fail. Likewise it is in nobody's interest to have a bank that ignores good profitable business based on geography.


simon__200

That coupled with the entire premise that the bank we've actually been discussing would be for the purpose of making loans to businesses (i.e. Commercial Banking), the phrase "The bank needs to be run on commercial lines otherwise it will fail. would indicate that those "commercial lines" you're talking about were pertaining to commercialism in the broader sense, because it's tautological otherwise. "The Commercial Bank needs to be run as a Commercial Bank".

what makes you think businesses relate to commercial banking? In the banks I advised over the past 15 years (and banks make up 40% of our fees) various names include business banking, commercial banking, wholesale banking, corporate banking and so on.

you are seemingly getting bogged down without actually understanding what I am saying. all banks (excluding blood banks, Bank of England, food banks and other types of banks that don't actually offer financial services) need to be run on a commercial basis. It is irrelevant whether the actual business unit or banking division is called commercial, corporate, retail, community, wholesale, international or whatever else you want to throw at it. It is still a bank that has a busines of providing lending/deposit products and services.

simon__200

It sure seems like you're just playing games sometimes, Jantra!

actually we are talking about banking which is an industry specialism, but hey ho. You're the one who cannot tell the difference between a bank being a commercial bank (ie offering services to businesses) and a bank having to operate on a commercial basis. The issue is with you and not me.

Re: never trust a politician

Jantra
simon__200

What you said was "that it is not possible for a bank to exist without it operating on a commercial basis", so if you're saying you meant specifically "Commercial Banking", rather than commercialism per se, then you'd effectively be saying "the only type of banking in existence is Commercial Banking". Which is tantamount to saying Retail Banking and Investment Banking doesn't exist. Which is ludicrous.

are you sure you know what you are talking about? who has said anything about commercial banking? you're now making things up to suit. What I said was that banks need to operate on a commercial basis. That means they need to provide products and services that their customers wish to use at a price that is competitive. It is not good having the Welsh nation's best interests at heart but not actually be able to provide a service that people or businesses will use. There are many banks out there and if the People Bank of Wales don't provide competitively priced services then it will fail. Likewise it is in nobody's interest to have a bank that ignores good profitable business based on geography.


simon__200

That coupled with the entire premise that the bank we've actually been discussing would be for the purpose of making loans to businesses (i.e. Commercial Banking), the phrase "The bank needs to be run on commercial lines otherwise it will fail. would indicate that those "commercial lines" you're talking about were pertaining to commercialism in the broader sense, because it's tautological otherwise. "The Commercial Bank needs to be run as a Commercial Bank".

what makes you think businesses relate to commercial banking? In the banks I advised over the past 15 years (and banks make up 40% of our fees) various names include business banking, commercial banking, wholesale banking, corporate banking and so on.

you are seemingly getting bogged down without actually understanding what I am saying. all banks (excluding blood banks, Bank of England, food banks and other types of banks that don't actually offer financial services) need to be run on a commercial basis. It is irrelevant whether the actual business unit or banking division is called commercial, corporate, retail, community, wholesale, international or whatever else you want to throw at it. It is still a bank that has a busines of providing lending/deposit products and services.

simon__200

It sure seems like you're just playing games sometimes, Jantra!

actually we are talking about banking which is an industry specialism, but hey ho. You're the one who cannot tell the difference between a bank being a commercial bank (ie offering services to businesses) and a bank having to operate on a commercial basis. The issue is with you and not me.



An lo we've flipped back to "commercial" as in not pertaining to "Commercial Banking" afterall, but this time nothing to do with profit motive, but specifically "provide products and services that their customers wish to use at a price that is competitive". How many people thought that it would be a great idea to bring out a bank that provided a service that nobody wanted that was costlier than what was already there? Seriously(!)

Re: never trust a politician

simon__200

An lo we've flipped back to "commercial" as in not pertaining to "Commercial Banking" afterall, but this time nothing to do with profit motive, but specifically "provide products and services that their customers wish to use at a price that is competitive". How many people thought that it would be a great idea to bring out a bank that provided a service that nobody wanted that was costlier than what was already there? Seriously(!)


firstly, no one has flipped. you just misunderstood. learn to live with it. Suggesting that a bank needs to operate on a commercial basis is quite different from talking about Commercial Banking (perhaps a business unit within a wholesale division).

i stand by what I said at the outset; any bank needs to operate on a commercial basis. You don't get that by having political interference. A good example that has been given was that initially Finance Wales turned away perfectly good business due to a post code. There is no commercial justification for doing so, the reason was political.

No one is saying we open a bank that provides a service that no one wants. What I am saying is it will be in the Welsh peoples longer term interests for the peoples bank to have free commercial reign to make their own decisions without political influence. I have no idea why you thought that was talking about business banking, commercial banking, corporate banking, community banking, retail banking, wholesale banking or anything else you wish to mention. it has nothing to do with that at all.

Re: never trust a politician

Anyone our compatriots are a little stupid or ignorant?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-22721462

Extremely satisfied with our schools?

Re: never trust a politician

Huw
Anyone our compatriots are a little stupid or ignorant?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-22721462

Extremely satisfied with our schools?


I think there is a big problem with surveys like this. The questions are framed to make people think of the personalities of their GPs and their school staff when answering - and generally they are good hardworking people. However, they are not asked questions like "do you think the current education system in Wales leaves your child more or less skilled than children in other countries?"

Re: never trust a politician

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-politics-22845976 That picture sums up everything about Welsh Labour.

Re: never trust a politician

Huw
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-politics-22845976 That picture sums up everything about Welsh Labour.


Just a photo of Chris Bryant would sum up everything that is wrong with Welsh Labour. In his underpants maybe? The hypocrisy of these b****rds should be a criminal offence. I know that would be hard to legislate for but this is a gigantic political and moral fraud. It just goes to show how tucked-up the media class is with Labour in Wales. These idiots are running this nation into the ground to perpetuate their empires and hegemony.
Fair enough the BBC has the story on the website but this should be on the front page of every type of media and headlines on the news.

Re: never trust a politician

I wouldn't say it is just the preserve if welsh labour. It is an accusation I'd label at the majority of politicians at all levels and from all parties. Most go into politics with the best of intentions but almost always end up being self serving parasites. No exceptions.

What makes it worse is the fact you get people defending one group but criticising another for doing exactly the same thing when in office. If I was king of the world they'd be the first against the wall before the politicians.

Re: never trust a politician

Jantra
I wouldn't say it is just the preserve if welsh labour. It is an accusation I'd label at the majority of politicians at all levels and from all parties. Most go into politics with the best of intentions but almost always end up being self serving parasites. No exceptions.

What makes it worse is the fact you get people defending one group but criticising another for doing exactly the same thing when in office. If I was king of the world they'd be the first against the wall before the politicians.


You said above "Most go into politics with the best of intentions but almost always end up being self serving parasites. No exceptions."
You contradicted yourself there, King Jantra. There are c*nts in every walk of life. Politics may be full of them, but other professions and roles have many c*nts too. You haven't met every politician, in fact I doubt that you have met many, so how would to what extent they are 'self-serving'?
Criticising people for being 'self-serving" isn't very insightful. Isn't everyone 'self-serving' to a large extent?
It's an immature debate. If we didn't have elected politicians, we'd have a dictatorship, monarchical, theocratic, plutocratic or technocratic. And the people doing the dictating would, (given that people are 'self-serving') certainly be massive c*nts.

Re: never trust a politician

you are going to have to explain why it is a contradiction? i never mentioned any other job or profession. I was discussing the self serving leeches that are our politicians. therefore I cannot understand what is there to contradict.

lets discuss an example of a politician that was self serving. there is this little province and it has its own assembly. this province has east west economic ties both in the north and the south. that is just the way it is. economic development shoul be along the east west axis and not the north south axis.

we have an assemblyman in charge of economic development. he is from the north. the assembly is in the south. does the assemblyman look to develop along the east west axis or does he look to create artificial links between north and south (such as state subsidised flights)?

the above is of course all made up and fictional, but if it were true you'd assume the assemblyman had artificially created a link between the north and south just to serve his own purpose of making his travel to work a lot easier.

thankfully we aren't blighted by such cronyism here in Wales

Re: never trust a politician

Jantra
Most go into politics with the best of intentions but almost always end up being self serving parasites. No exceptions.


You said "[politicians] almost always end up being self serving parasites. No exceptions"

You see the contradiction between "almost always" and "No exceptions"?

Ieuan Wyn Jones had very little power under the pre 2011 devolution settlement and took the portfolio in 2008, just as the financial crisis took hold and during a severe recession. Being a member of Plaid Cymru he naturally wanted to improve links between North and South Wales.
He is committed to Wales and its people and their happiness and health. Just like Leanne Wood, who gave up a massive part of her salary when elected leader.

Re: never trust a politician

B. Lee Dingobvious
Jantra
Most go into politics with the best of intentions but almost always end up being self serving parasites. No exceptions.


You said "[politicians] almost always end up being self serving parasites. No exceptions"

You see the contradiction between "almost always" and "No exceptions"?

Ieuan Wyn Jones had very little power under the pre 2011 devolution settlement and took the portfolio in 2008, just as the financial crisis took hold and during a severe recession. Being a member of Plaid Cymru he naturally wanted to improve links between North and South Wales.
He is committed to Wales and its people and their happiness and health. Just like Leanne Wood, who gave up a massive part of her salary when elected leader.


the 'no exceptions' comment was about parties and not politicians. you just didn't see it though. just like the comment about those being first against the wall. your comment above proves it.

IWJ was useless as economic development minister. That is being kind. he used his position to create a route that had absolutely no economic justification. That is cronyism. If IWJ lived in Swansea or somewhere where he did not benefit from it then I'd say you might be right (in this case), but the undeniable fact is that IWJ had a plane ride from Gwynedd to Cardiff as a result of his own policy.

there are none so blind etc etc.

Re: never trust a politician

Umm the Cardiff to Anglesey service still operates, Jantra. 10 flights a week. My Dad did it last week for a meeting in Bangor. Well done IWJ for linking the two ends of our beautiful country.

Re: never trust a politician

B. Lee Dingobvious
Umm the Cardiff to Anglesey service still operates, Jantra. 10 flights a week. My Dad did it last week for a meeting in Bangor. Well done IWJ for linking the two ends of our beautiful country.


are you sure it is the same service that IWJ used? I'm not.

Re: never trust a politician

Jantra
B. Lee Dingobvious
Umm the Cardiff to Anglesey service still operates, Jantra. 10 flights a week. My Dad did it last week for a meeting in Bangor. Well done IWJ for linking the two ends of our beautiful country.


are you sure it is the same service that IWJ used? I'm not.


It's a different airline. But the flight is the same with the same aircraft and destinations.

Re: never trust a politician

B. Lee Dingobvious
Jantra
B. Lee Dingobvious
Umm the Cardiff to Anglesey service still operates, Jantra. 10 flights a week. My Dad did it last week for a meeting in Bangor. Well done IWJ for linking the two ends of our beautiful country.


are you sure it is the same service that IWJ used? I'm not.


It's a different airline. But the flight is the same with the same aircraft and destinations.


so it is not the same then. the route set up by IWJ failed once he was out of office and the subsidy was stopped. good. we got to the truth in the end.

Re: never trust a politician

Jantra
B. Lee Dingobvious
Jantra
B. Lee Dingobvious
Umm the Cardiff to Anglesey service still operates, Jantra. 10 flights a week. My Dad did it last week for a meeting in Bangor. Well done IWJ for linking the two ends of our beautiful country.


are you sure it is the same service that IWJ used? I'm not.


It's a different airline. But the flight is the same with the same aircraft and destinations.


so it is not the same then. the route set up by IWJ failed once he was out of office and the subsidy was stopped. good. we got to the truth in the end.



The public service obligation continues, something like £1.2M 2013. Manx2.com was subject to a management buyout and the virtual airline is now Citywings although the flights are actually operated and planes owned by Links Air. The route was originally operated by Highland Airways but they went bust in 2010 when they could not secure new investment, they operated seven routes in Scotland, newspaper distribution and scottish fishery flights.

Passenger numbers around 8,500 per 11/12 year so subsidy per passenger in region of £139. Not the best use of money all things considered but £1.2M is not going to buy much in terms of transport infrastructure especially for Anglesey. Personally if you are subsidising fares for as many people as possible then buses may have been a better use of the monies.

The real problem even for east west transport is that the WG does not have full control over the transport sector, eg severn bridge tolls, mainline rail in north and south wales reliant on London whim, and large road improvements that really need to be financed by loans so that they can be paid for over a long period.

IWJ had very few levers but I would argue that internal links are just as important as east west for many communities. The north-south rail link is well supported and seems busy when ever I have used it. The road improvements at Builth Wells - Newbridge-on-Wye, or Porthmadog are a huge improvement as will the Newtown by-pass when complete. No government can ignore more peripheral areas and these costs are relatively limited.

Re: never trust a politician

Jeremy

Am I right in thinking that you are saying that WG already subsidise travel from the North to the South via ATW and that there would have been better options than subsidising an underutilised air route? I would imagine that if IWJ was truly a man of the people then taking the train like everyone else would have been a preferred option.

This is a case in point about my condemnation of politicians in general. How many end up with directorships or consultancy roles? What I can’t understand about our AMs that is they need an away from home allowance. This is absurd. If you live as far away as Merthyr, Swansea or Cwmbran then you really are within commuting distance of Cardiff and don’t need the allowance.

People enter politics with an intention of making the world a better place but almost always end up feathering their own nest and making their own existence as comfortable as can be.

Re: never trust a politician

this really does beggar belief. It shows the utter contempt that all our politicians have for us, no matter what political party. Seemingly, this little strumpet is the worst of the lot. Perhaps her party can make a stand and distance themselves from her? Or perhaps they agree with the nose in the trough approach so endemic throughout politics.

It is time for us to do away with the whole idea of politicians and government as they are entirely corruptible - every single one of them.

Re: never trust a politician

Jantra
this really does beggar belief. It shows the utter contempt that all our politicians have for us, no matter what political party. Seemingly, this little strumpet is the worst of the lot. Perhaps her party can make a stand and distance themselves from her? Or perhaps they agree with the nose in the trough approach so endemic throughout politics.

It is time for us to do away with the whole idea of politicians and government as they are entirely corruptible - every single one of them.


Why do the actions of one politician mean that all politicians have contempt for 'us'?

With what would you replace politicians and governments?

You seem to be very excited about this polician's errors but you haven't mentioned the recurring cash-for-questions scandals; the lobbying scandals; the very serious Westminster expenses scandals; the Rebekah Brooks/ Andy Coulson scandals or gigantic scandals such as Blair's lies over going to war with Iraq?

Could this be because you were briefly a member of Plaid Cymru?

Re: never trust a politician

Jeff Lynne
Jantra
this really does beggar belief. It shows the utter contempt that all our politicians have for us, no matter what political party. Seemingly, this little strumpet is the worst of the lot. Perhaps her party can make a stand and distance themselves from her? Or perhaps they agree with the nose in the trough approach so endemic throughout politics.

It is time for us to do away with the whole idea of politicians and government as they are entirely corruptible - every single one of them.


Why do the actions of one politician mean that all politicians have contempt for 'us'?

With what would you replace politicians and governments?

You seem to be very excited about this polician's errors but you haven't mentioned the recurring cash-for-questions scandals; the lobbying scandals; the very serious Westminster expenses scandals; the Rebekah Brooks/ Andy Coulson scandals or gigantic scandals such as Blair's lies over going to war with Iraq?

Could this be because you were briefly a member of Plaid Cymru?



Splendid!

You have proved my point. Politics and politicians are corrupt. I'm not affiliated to any party so view it through impartial eyes. All I can see is abuse of position from the very top to the very bottom.

They are supposed to serve us but end up serving themselves.

Re: never trust a politician

Welsh Labour are at it again with their own brand of cronyism and nefarious Machiavellian dealings. When will the Welsh electorate ever appreciate that you don’t get politicians with morals when you vote in left wing parties. They are either ensuring their mates buy up land for way below land values thus fleecing us taxpayers of proper value, they set up subsidised aircraft journeys between their place of work and their front door or end up driving under the influence endangering public lives whilst at same time taking us – the public – as fools by claiming hotel expenses when going to what third rate performers.

Only a muggings would attempt to defend any of the above and the people and parties they represent.

Re: never trust a politician

I know I may be taking the bait but it isn't just 'the left'', Labour can hardly be called a party of the left any more, but the entire political system is broken. Here's what Parliament have been up too recently http://socialinvestigations.blogspot.co.uk/2012/02/nhs-privatisation-compilation-of.html

Re: never trust a politician

SP
I know I may be taking the bait but it isn't just 'the left'', Labour can hardly be called a party of the left any more, but the entire political system is broken. Here's what Parliament have been up too recently http://socialinvestigations.blogspot.co.uk/2012/02/nhs-privatisation-compilation-of.html



The problem is that politicians are generally self serving and only interested in furthering their own careers. Not only that but we have a situation where the public sector can kill people with their negligence and still carry on. That alone is a reason why the private sector should be involved in delivering public services. If the private sector service delivery fails then you can remove the service provider. There is no such removal mechanism when you have a state monopoly. We only need to look at the mid staffs NHS debacle as well as this article to see that the public sector is not necessarily impervious to failure on a dramatic scale.

NB i am not suggesting privatisation of all public services, I am merely saying that there is good and bad in both sectors and to suggest that only one sector – as some do – is capable of delivering public services is completely untrue. There need to be a balance between public/private partnership such that failures such as we are seeing in the NHS mean that the service provider is removed and the opportunity is provided to someone else. You do not get that option with state capitalism.

Re: never trust a politician

I think it's scary how ignorant people are about how healthcare can be provided and is provided in other countries. People in the UK seem to genuinly believe that the NHS is a unique system that guarantees universal healthcare and also that it's the envy of the world. From personal experience everytime i've explained to people the different systems that exist in France, Germany, Japan ect there has always been a look of bewilderment on the face of the person I talk to people think that the only other option is some awful American system. In light of the scanadal at Mid Staffs hopefully the faith in our state religion is being shaken and we can have a more open debate.

Re: never trust a politician

Jantra
Welsh Labour are at it again with their own brand of cronyism and nefarious Machiavellian dealings. When will the Welsh electorate ever appreciate that you don’t get politicians with morals when you vote in left wing parties. They are either ensuring their mates buy up land for way below land values thus fleecing us taxpayers of proper value, they set up subsidised aircraft journeys between their place of work and their front door or end up driving under the influence endangering public lives whilst at same time taking us – the public – as fools by claiming hotel expenses when going to what third rate performers.

Only a muggings would attempt to defend any of the above and the people and parties they represent.


I don't think you can put any of that down to "left wing parties".

Surely by its very definition those sorts of things are pretty much the dealings of right wing parties, while "left wing" is supposed to be about re-distribution and social justice for all.

The fact that you later go on to blame "politicians generally" when called on this, just goes to show your general bias here. I can only assume that you're deliberately baiting, because the other alternative is that you believe right wing politicians are more likely to be, well let's say; deliver a "left wing" ethos.

Re: never trust a politician

Huw
I think it's scary how ignorant people are about how healthcare can be provided and is provided in other countries. People in the UK seem to genuinly believe that the NHS is a unique system that guarantees universal healthcare and also that it's the envy of the world. From personal experience everytime i've explained to people the different systems that exist in France, Germany, Japan ect there has always been a look of bewilderment on the face of the person I talk to people think that the only other option is some awful American system. In light of the scanadal at Mid Staffs hopefully the faith in our state religion is being shaken and we can have a more open debate.


I couldn't agree more. Unfortunately for some reason discussion of the issue is taboo.

Re: never trust a politician

Hi everyone.

Just found this forumn today so forgive me for my lack of tech knowledge etc. Anyway, what strikes me is actually how intelligent all the submissions have been (with one or two unfortunate exceptions which we can all happily ignore!).

On the one hand, I see exactly where Lyndon, B Leeding Obvious and Simon come from - but also Jantra. What I find really encouraging is that actually you are all pretty much saying the same thing. We're all on the same side.

We all agree that Wales is currently not ready for independence, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't aspire for it.

Political autonomy is different to cultural autonomy and one can be culturally British whilst also aspring for political independence.

Jantra is merely being objective and quite right when he says that we should not want independence for the sake of it - it should only be desirable if it will actually make a better difference in our lives. But actually that's exactly what Plaid Cymru says too (Some of its members probably do want it any cost and that's why they joined - because Plaid is the party that comes closest to serving their belief.).

But that's no reason to diss the party!

Please correct me if I'm wrong Jantra, but from what I have read, you have no objection to aspiring towards independence - it's just that the circumstances have to be right first before one even considers it. I mean, I love my neighbours but I don't want them telling me what colour to paint my house! So - I welcome autonomy for Wales as a goal - but the structures need to be right first otherwise it won't work.

I agree with that sentiment - as does Plaid Cymru and I suspect quite a few members of other parties in Wales.

The thing is that we need to look at things objectively and constructively. And if you pass over the banter and point scoring, what's really encouraging is that there really is a huge amount of expertise and common ground between you. You just need to trust each other that you all have the future of the people of Wales at heart and are trying to find a common solution to it.

Thank you all for this thread - it's really interesting and has educated me immensely.

Perhaps you can now look at what you all have in common and agree on a common manifesto. This would be very exciting - good luck to you all.



Re: never trust a politician

simon__200
Jantra
Welsh Labour are at it again with their own brand of cronyism and nefarious Machiavellian dealings. When will the Welsh electorate ever appreciate that you don’t get politicians with morals when you vote in left wing parties. They are either ensuring their mates buy up land for way below land values thus fleecing us taxpayers of proper value, they set up subsidised aircraft journeys between their place of work and their front door or end up driving under the influence endangering public lives whilst at same time taking us – the public – as fools by claiming hotel expenses when going to what third rate performers.

Only a muggings would attempt to defend any of the above and the people and parties they represent.


I don't think you can put any of that down to "left wing parties".

Surely by its very definition those sorts of things are pretty much the dealings of right wing parties, while "left wing" is supposed to be about re-distribution and social justice for all.

The fact that you later go on to blame "politicians generally" when called on this, just goes to show your general bias here. I can only assume that you're deliberately baiting, because the other alternative is that you believe right wing politicians are more likely to be, well let's say; deliver a "left wing" ethos.


Simon

generally politicians are self serving - that is right across the spectrum. However my disdain is more geared towards the left wing as you quite correctly point out they all for social justice and equality when not in power but as soon as they get a sniff they forget all their morals and reasons for running in the first place. The right wing politicians tend to be more for a culture of opportunity and grasping whatever chance comes your way. in that respect they at least are true to form.

so whilst both are equally as guilty, the left wing politicians are morally bereft.

Re: never trust a politician

Incredible Bulk
Hi everyone.

Just found this forumn today so forgive me for my lack of tech knowledge etc. Anyway, what strikes me is actually how intelligent all the submissions have been (with one or two unfortunate exceptions which we can all happily ignore!).

On the one hand, I see exactly where Lyndon, B Leeding Obvious and Simon come from - but also Jantra. What I find really encouraging is that actually you are all pretty much saying the same thing. We're all on the same side.

We all agree that Wales is currently not ready for independence, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't aspire for it.

Political autonomy is different to cultural autonomy and one can be culturally British whilst also aspring for political independence.

Jantra is merely being objective and quite right when he says that we should not want independence for the sake of it - it should only be desirable if it will actually make a better difference in our lives. But actually that's exactly what Plaid Cymru says too (Some of its members probably do want it any cost and that's why they joined - because Plaid is the party that comes closest to serving their belief.).

But that's no reason to diss the party!

Please correct me if I'm wrong Jantra, but from what I have read, you have no objection to aspiring towards independence - it's just that the circumstances have to be right first before one even considers it. I mean, I love my neighbours but I don't want them telling me what colour to paint my house! So - I welcome autonomy for Wales as a goal - but the structures need to be right first otherwise it won't work.

I agree with that sentiment - as does Plaid Cymru and I suspect quite a few members of other parties in Wales.

The thing is that we need to look at things objectively and constructively. And if you pass over the banter and point scoring, what's really encouraging is that there really is a huge amount of expertise and common ground between you. You just need to trust each other that you all have the future of the people of Wales at heart and are trying to find a common solution to it.

Thank you all for this thread - it's really interesting and has educated me immensely.

Perhaps you can now look at what you all have in common and agree on a common manifesto. This would be very exciting - good luck to you all.





nail and hammer

Re: never trust a politician

Jantra
simon__200
Jantra
Welsh Labour are at it again with their own brand of cronyism and nefarious Machiavellian dealings. When will the Welsh electorate ever appreciate that you don’t get politicians with morals when you vote in left wing parties. They are either ensuring their mates buy up land for way below land values thus fleecing us taxpayers of proper value, they set up subsidised aircraft journeys between their place of work and their front door or end up driving under the influence endangering public lives whilst at same time taking us – the public – as fools by claiming hotel expenses when going to what third rate performers.

Only a muggings would attempt to defend any of the above and the people and parties they represent.


I don't think you can put any of that down to "left wing parties".

Surely by its very definition those sorts of things are pretty much the dealings of right wing parties, while "left wing" is supposed to be about re-distribution and social justice for all.

The fact that you later go on to blame "politicians generally" when called on this, just goes to show your general bias here. I can only assume that you're deliberately baiting, because the other alternative is that you believe right wing politicians are more likely to be, well let's say; deliver a "left wing" ethos.


Simon

generally politicians are self serving - that is right across the spectrum. However my disdain is more geared towards the left wing as you quite correctly point out they all for social justice and equality when not in power but as soon as they get a sniff they forget all their morals and reasons for running in the first place. The right wing politicians tend to be more for a culture of opportunity and grasping whatever chance comes your way. in that respect they at least are true to form.

so whilst both are equally as guilty, the left wing politicians are morally bereft.


As I thought, you're giving a free reign to right wing politicians, but your main reason for criticising left wing ones, is that they're not left wing enough for you. Brilliant(!)

Re: never trust a politician

simon__200

As I thought, you're giving a free reign to right wing politicians, but your main reason for criticising left wing ones, is that they're not left wing enough for you. Brilliant(!)


I'm doing no such thing. I am saying that left wingers get voted in on a ticket of policies that are about distribution, social mobility and so on. Yet as soon as they get in this is discarded and they take all that they can. Right wingers don't make any such promises preferring a culture of opportunity. The fact they take from the trough is in line with their culture of opportunity. Both are bereft of morals and need to be put up against the wall, but some more so than others.

lets look at the evidence:-

Mark Serwotka - man of the people on £100k plus per annum
Len Mccluskey - man of the people on £120k plus per annum
Arthur Scargill - man of the people living in grace and favour apartment in the London Barbican costing £1m plus
David Milliband - man of the people earning film star money
Tony Blair - he's no stranger to the good life

the list goes on. I've merely highlighted the obvious ones but lets face it any politician who claims to be left leaning will have forgotten why they were elected at some point and jump on the gravy train. They all do it. The first sniff of power and they forget their principles and adopt the mantra 'what's in it for me'.

Re: never trust a politician

Jantra
simon__200

As I thought, you're giving a free reign to right wing politicians, but your main reason for criticising left wing ones, is that they're not left wing enough for you. Brilliant(!)


I'm doing no such thing. I am saying that left wingers get voted in on a ticket of policies that are about distribution, social mobility and so on. Yet as soon as they get in this is discarded and they take all that they can. Right wingers don't make any such promises preferring a culture of opportunity. The fact they take from the trough is in line with their culture of opportunity. Both are bereft of morals and need to be put up against the wall, but some more so than others.

lets look at the evidence:-

Mark Serwotka - man of the people on £100k plus per annum
Len Mccluskey - man of the people on £120k plus per annum
Arthur Scargill - man of the people living in grace and favour apartment in the London Barbican costing £1m plus
David Milliband - man of the people earning film star money
Tony Blair - he's no stranger to the good life

the list goes on. I've merely highlighted the obvious ones but lets face it any politician who claims to be left leaning will have forgotten why they were elected at some point and jump on the gravy train. They all do it. The first sniff of power and they forget their principles and adopt the mantra 'what's in it for me'.



This sort of "you can't be a leftie if you can afford a pair of shoes on your feet" BS reminds me of the situation when Neil Kinnock was made a European Commissioner.

As soon as we have one of our guys in the job, it's all "snouts in the trough" "hypocrisy" "He should be doing it for the love alone" crap. Not a peep about Leon Brittan being appointed at exactly the same time.

One of the demands of the original chartists was that MPs should be paid a proper decent salary, so that that this is their full time job. If this doesn't happen, then you just end up with landowners and people who don't need to get paid, or just consider their salary pocket money. No, I'm not saying MPs should be paid a ridiculous sum - though certainly, at least on a par with GPs, dentists and school heads.

We know that the expenses scandal came about because instead of making their pay increments public and open, they were actively encouraged to make use of the covert generous expenses scheme instead. By all means do away with that, and make the whole thing overt -but let's not be surprised that people availed themselves of the opportunity when they were encouraged to do so. The MPs' expenses was bubbling under for at least a decade. "The John Lewis List" it used to be referred to as. I know it wouldn't be any different in my office, and I doubt it would be in any organisation. In fact I find it surprising that people expected MPs would behave different too when offered it on a plate.

It's actually encouraging to me that so many didn't have their snouts in the expenses trough - my own (left wing) MP - Paul Flynn among them - who I have the utmost respect for.

*rant over.

Re: never trust a politician

I wasn't referring to expenses per se as it is small beer compared to some of the riches to be gained. i do agree with you though. make MPs salaries decent enough. we want inclusive politics so for that we need to make sure MPs are remunerated sufficiently that a decent career can be had. Otherwise as you say it becomes the preserve of either the rich or those backed by the unions which really is in nobodies long term interests.

back to expenses - you make a valid point although the individual is capable of looking at their own moral compass. How many Labour MPs have been indicted in relation to the expenses scandal? How many Welsh AMs choose to take the overnight allowance when they could in all honesty commute to Cardiff? I really don't buy the fact they need somewhere to stay if they work late. I've worked late plenty of times in Bristol - often finishing beyond midnight and I've still managed to get in my car and drive back and still be back in Bristol the next day for 9am. If I'm able to do it so can our AMs. The fact they don't is due to the fact they choose to abuse the system. any AM who lives within an hours drive shouldn't be entitled to any overnight allowances just like the rest of us

Re: never trust a politician

I'm not sure if its this post we were discussing finance for welsh business but tonight on BBC they are discussing this

Re: never trust a politician

Good old statism and socialism, whilst the rest of the uk are powering ahead with house building we in Wales are actually going backwards. Its a good job really as we have a glut of housing and our economy is overheating.

linky

When will people finally appreciate that statism and sociali is not about making things fairer but its about controlling how the masses live their lives.

Re: never trust a politician

Cronyism is not an exclusive left wing problem, there is example after example of 'crony capitalism' in the Tory joke of a government we are enduring now. Left polotics is shite but right polotics is far worse. If we had a truly representative political system we would have capitalism that works for everyone not just the small number of establishment toffs at the top.

Anyway, I won't get a say in the concept of tax powers for WAG now that I am in London, but I really hope WAG gets devolved tax powers because then they'll have to take resposibility when thet fuck it all up and people will be able to see that they're not capable of balancing a set of scales let alone real money, crash and burn baby!!

Re: never trust a politician

oh dear!

I wonder how the devolution/welsh labour/socialist (delete as appropriate) apologists will swerve this little nugget of news.

Re: never trust a politician

Whilst I don't disagree that a child's education begins at home, this is confirmation from the welsh government/welsh labour/socialist that their education policies are failing our children and that we need a whole new education paradigm.

We knew this already though with Wales' fall through the PISA rankings. It is becoming clear that the left wing/socialist approach reduces standards overall. This government has failed a generation and that will be their legacy. Anyone who has voted for welsh labour are culpable and have to shoulder a proportion of the blame

Re: never trust a politician

Jantra
Whilst I don't disagree that a child's education begins at home, this is confirmation from the welsh government/welsh labour/socialist that their education policies are failing our children and that we need a whole new education paradigm.

We knew this already though with Wales' fall through the PISA rankings. It is becoming clear that the left wing/socialist approach reduces standards overall. This government has failed a generation and that will be their legacy. Anyone who has voted for welsh labour are culpable and have to shoulder a proportion of the blame


Jantra you are sounding more and more like a political broadcast, when are you standing for office?

While I do not agree with the way Labour have dealt with education in Wales in particular the underfunding compared to England your rhetoric needs to be brought under control. In 2013 the Wales GCSE results were passes at A*-C at 65.7%. Equivalent figures for A* to C passes were 67.9% in England, 76.5% in Northern Ireland, and 68.1% across the three nations.

The proportion getting an A* or an A fell from 22.4% to 21.3% across the three nations while in Wales they remained the same at 19.2%.

Considering that in private schools a third of GCSE passes were graded A* (Daily Telegraph) and that in Wales the private sector hardly exists, take those private school results out of the English figures and I would suggest that the difference is even smaller in the state sectors.

This blog by an ex-advisor to Gove, suggests that not everything is rosy in the whole of England and that London can be skewing the overall results http://samfreedman1.blogspot.co.uk/2014/01/5-interesting-things-from-2013-gcse-data.html

Parents are pivotal in their children's education and those first 4 years of life and then continuing support of school and education will determine in large part their children's educational experience and success. It is why the middle classes do better than working class kids and so cannot be ignored.

If you want a new paradigm it starts with the parents who also happen to be the voters. Unfortunately or fortunately depending on your point of view, in Wales, they have not listened to your advice so far and seem intent on voting Labour.



Re: never trust a politician

I was in secondary school in Wales from 2003-2010 I passed my GCSE's but failed miserably at A-Levels. In 2012 I was diagnosed dyslexic by a private psychologist, clearly in school my teachers were just happy to let me coast along or blame me for not being up to standard I know this all anecdotal what I am saying but from what I saw in secondary school and talking to other young people who have left school in Wales clearly there are serious problems in our education system. Jantra is absolutely right Welsh Labour have absolutely failed a generation of Welsh young people in fact they have failed us for a century perfectly happy to sit back and let Wales decline and blame it all on the Tories. I despise them, the sooner they are out of office the better for our country unfortunately that prospect looks as distant as ever unforuntately. Wales has quite an ignorant, apathetic and quite franly stupid electorate.

Re: never trust a politician

Jeremy

I'm certainly not standing for office - rest assured that will never happen. I'd rather see the destruction of the state rather than be part of it.

You do raise some interesting points. I have to agree that private education does increase standards and continually gets better results than what the state can achieve. Yet somehow the left seem to think that only the state can provide. Why can't we have something of a halfway house where education is funded by the state but delivered entirely by the private sector? Why does the state have to be all pervasive in what it does? The same applies to health as well - in Germany it is entirely delivered by the private sector and around 4/5 is funded by the state with the rest being private funding. The German system is miles ahead of our NHS but the UK/Welsh socialists/left would rather have inferior levels of service than involve the private sector in service delivery.

I also think that considering we don't really have a media of note in Wales than really scrutinises what the government is doing, it is even more important that as citizens we hold our government to account. We don't seem to have politicians capable of doing that and the media certainly isn't capable. It is important for people to appreciate just how we are faring in Wales compared to the rest of the UK. you cannot hide behind the fact that Wales doesn't have a private education system of note when the Welsh populace vote time and again for left wing policies of dependency and welfare rather than opportunity and individualism.

Re: never trust a politician

Jantra,

Why does a private education tend to be more successful or appear to be more successful:

Resources e.g. money, generally, which gives a far more advantageous student:pupil ratio which gives more time per pupil.

Parent expectation, they are paying directly after all. The kids know this and are aware of the expectation and parents are often supportive of their children.

Independence and continuity.

On the minus side private schools cheat the system, they generally enter kids into fewer examinations at GCSE level, and many schools will not enter children unless they are confident they will get a good result. The child can be entered privately, and if they get a good result the school claims the result and refunds the parent. (Friends have children at a famous school in Cheshire where this happens)

That is not to say that lessons cannot be learned from the private sector, more money is needed in the schools to be spent on teachers and facilities. Independence and less top down direction from both government and business. Supportive parents with expectation of their children, often missing or misplaced for example believing that little Johnny is an angel when they are a right shit in school and not supporting school discipline.

Absolutely right about the media in Wales, but is also applies to the National & regional Media in the UK as a whole, papers have major economic problems which cuts real journalism, commercial television generally avoids complex socio-economic problems and the BBC has been in a political straight jacket since the Iraq War. You have to search for stories and information and most people will never do this.

Re: never trust a politician

Jeremy

private education appears more successful because it is more successful. I agree that resources are different but you need to remember the state still provides funding for private schools albeit not all of it. The state school system prefers to spend its money on a bureaucratic leviathan overseeing the system as a whole rather than spending the money on more teachers. I know which I'd prefer: less bureaucrats and more teachers. The bureaucrats need something to do so they are continually monitoring and recording the performance of the teachers which results in teachers focussing less on teaching and more on paperwork and processes. The recent PISA results showed Finland as a model to follow. Finland has minimal state intervention in its schooling system so what is the first thing the Welsh Government announces as a result - more state intervention. You couldn't make it up.

The state is clearly not fit for purpose any longer. Too much is spent on wasteful bureaucracy rather than delivering front line services and the impact is clear for all to see. Political parties aren't concerned with the long term welfare of the nation and are only interested in ensuring they are voted in at the next election. Between 1997-2003 Labour increased the public sector by 1m people: 200k front line staff and 800k administrative roles. It beggars belief that you require an extra 800k people to provide support to 200k front line staff - the ratio should be the other way around. In other words, Labour flooded the public sector with around 750k more jobs that were really required and they did this to secure votes - no other reason. The cost of providing such additional staff is around £30bn per annum - and some wonder why the UK is in the financial mess it is in.

When you consider that you need to find something to do for the extra 750k workers, you suddenly appreciate that the processes have to be amended to ensure the 750k workers have something to do. This increases bureaucracy and reduces productivity whilst at the same time slows the whole system down. We have seen the resultant affects in Wales with respect to the economy, education and health.

If you are wondering where I am going with this then the point is that political parties aren't the most appropriate method of government. All parties look to the next election rather than looking to make long term decisions for the benefit of everyone. For that reason, the state cannot be trusted to make the right decisions in terms of eduction, health and the economy. By all means the state can fund health and education, but it really is best left to the private sector to deliver. German healthcare is a prime example of this philosophy along with the UK private education system.

It will never happen as some people are so preoccupied with ideology that they were prefer to see lower standards overall than admit that perhaps the free market is better at delivery than state capitalism.

Re: never trust a politician

Jantra
private education appears more successful because it is more successful. I agree that resources are different but you need to remember the state still provides funding for private schools albeit not all of it. The state school system prefers to spend its money on a bureaucratic leviathan overseeing the system as a whole rather than spending the money on more teachers. I know which I'd prefer: less bureaucrats and more teachers. The bureaucrats need something to do so they are continually monitoring and recording the performance of the teachers which results in teachers focussing less on teaching and more on paperwork and processes. The recent PISA results showed Finland as a model to follow. Finland has minimal state intervention in its schooling system so what is the first thing the Welsh Government announces as a result - more state intervention. You couldn't make it up.

The state is clearly not fit for purpose any longer. Too much is spent on wasteful bureaucracy rather than delivering front line services and the impact is clear for all to see. Political parties aren't concerned with the long term welfare of the nation and are only interested in ensuring they are voted in at the next election. Between 1997-2003 Labour increased the public sector by 1m people: 200k front line staff and 800k administrative roles. It beggars belief that you require an extra 800k people to provide support to 200k front line staff - the ratio should be the other way around. In other words, Labour flooded the public sector with around 750k more jobs that were really required and they did this to secure votes - no other reason. The cost of providing such additional staff is around £30bn per annum - and some wonder why the UK is in the financial mess it is in.


Jantra, I do not vote Labour and their choices are not the ones I would have made.

The real reason this country is in a financial mess is largely because of decisions made by the private sector - banks going bust, offshoring, lack of investment in manufacturing and squandering natural resources (not valuing them for the long term). Yes the state can make similar mistakes but at least they can be made to change.

If you read my post you would know that I would prefer schools largely independent of central control. The point I was making with private education is that when you compare and contrast with the state system you are not comparing like with like, so of course it seems more successful. Whether it is better for the individual varies as it does in the state sector.

There was an interesting programme on last night showing a Cardiff School - St Illtyds - in special measures. What was interesting was when the head visited a London school - an academy of some sort. What gave them the success - independence and money - 6X per pupil what St Illtyds had to play with!

Jantra
If you are wondering where I am going with this then the point is that political parties aren't the most appropriate method of government. All parties look to the next election rather than looking to make long term decisions for the benefit of everyone. For that reason, the state cannot be trusted to make the right decisions in terms of eduction, health and the economy. By all means the state can fund health and education, but it really is best left to the private sector to deliver. German healthcare is a prime example of this philosophy along with the UK private education system.

It will never happen as some people are so preoccupied with ideology that they were prefer to see lower standards overall than admit that perhaps the free market is better at delivery than state capitalism.


You are just replacing one ideology with another and it would lead to a dictatorship of one sort or another. The private sector always trends towards monopoly.

Electoral cycles are a pain and yes lead to short termism but the system we have is not the only possible one, PR, elect 1/5 of parliament every year, internet plebicites, there are lots of permutations. Do I want some company making decisions on my behalf, no I do not.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
CARDIFFWALESMAP - FORUM